MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2009519445 · doi:10.3808/jei.200400036

Estimation of Censored Data Water Quality Values Using Decomposable Markov Networks

2004· article· en· W2009519445 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Environmental Informatics · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersMinistry of EnvironmentCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsGraphical modelInferenceData miningMarkov chainMarkov modelComputer scienceNormalityMissing dataProbabilistic logicData modelingMathematicsStatisticsMachine learningArtificial intelligenceDatabase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

While application of probabilistic inference modeling to large and complex datasets has been limited both as a result of computational difficulties, and implicit/explicit assumptions of normality and lognormality, an alternative is developed herein, based on advancements in graphical modeling using decomposable Markov networks (DMNs). Uncertainties in estimates for censored and/or missing data, are reduced by quantifying dependencies among quality attributes using DMNs. The dependence structure is modeled by a DMN, and established using training data. The improvement from learning DMNs employing the training data is demonstrated using water quality information from water distribution systems. The approach provides a general alternative to traditional techniques for estimating values for censored data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.298
Threshold uncertainty score0.323

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it