On irreducible and transitive subalgebras in matrix algebras
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Let R = M n (D) be the n × n matrix ring over a division ring D and let A be a subring of R with r as the smallest non-zero rank present in A. It is shown that A is a transitive subring of R if and only if r divides n and after a similarity A = M n/r (Δ), where Δ is a transitive division subring of M r (D). Let A be an F-subalgebra of R with 1 R ∈ A, where F is the centre of R, and let C R (A) denote the centralizer of A in R. Using the above result, we describe when the centralizer C R (A) is transitive or irreducible in R. Further assume that D is finite dimensional over F. It is shown that C R (A) is a transitive subalgebra of R if and only if the tensor product is a division algebra. In this case, dim(A F ) is the smallest non-zero rank present in C R (A).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it