OP‐ED ‘Many hands make light work’ but ‘too many cooks spoil the broth’: representing literacy teaching as a ‘job for experts’ undermines efforts to involve parents
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Additional informationNotes on contributorsROZ STOOKE Roz Stooke is a doctoral student in the J. G. Althouse Faculty of Education, University of Western Ontario, 1137 Western Road, London, ON, N6G 1G7, Canada; e‐mail: rkstooke@uwo.ca. She is interested in young children's literacy and social policies in support of early childhood education and care.JCS invites comments on this paper for publication on the journal's website. Address comments to Ian Westbury, General editor of JCS, at westbury@uiuc.edu. All such comments on this paper, and on other papers in the journal, can be accessed at http://www.ed.uiuc.edu/jcs/. Roz Stooke is a doctoral student in the J. G. Althouse Faculty of Education, University of Western Ontario, 1137 Western Road, London, ON, N6G 1G7, Canada; e‐mail: rkstooke@uwo.ca. She is interested in young children's literacy and social policies in support of early childhood education and care.JCS invites comments on this paper for publication on the journal's website. Address comments to Ian Westbury, General editor of JCS, at westbury@uiuc.edu. All such comments on this paper, and on other papers in the journal, can be accessed at http://www.ed.uiuc.edu/jcs/.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it