MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2009884563 · doi:10.1137/070706380

Stability of Curved Interfaces in the Perturbed Two-Dimensional Allen–Cahn System

2009· article· en· W2009884563 on OpenAlexaff
David Iron, Theodore Kolokolonikov, John Rumsey, Juncheng Wei

Bibliographic record

VenueSIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEigenvalues and eigenvectorsAllen–Cahn equationOmegaBounded functionDomain (mathematical analysis)Mathematical analysisSingular perturbationMathematicsComputationPerturbation (astronomy)Limit (mathematics)Mathematical physicsPure mathematicsCombinatoricsPhysicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider the singular limit of a perturbed Allen–Cahn model on a bounded two-dimensional domain: $\left\{\begin{array}{@{}ll@{}} u_t = \varepsilon^2 \Delta u - 2 (u - \varepsilon a) (u^2 - 1), & x \in \Omega \subset \mathbb{R}^2 \ \partial_n u = 0, & x \in \partial \Omega \end{array} \right.$ where $\varepsilon$ is a small parameter and a is an $O(1)$ quantity. We study equilibrium solutions that have the form of a curved interface. Using singular perturbation techniques, we fully characterize the stability of such an equilibrium in terms of a certain geometric eigenvalue problem, and give a simple geometric interpretation of our stability results. Full numerical computations of the time-dependent PDE as well as of the associated two-dimensional eigenvalue problem are shown to be in excellent agreement with the analytical predictions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSIAM Journal on Applied MathematicsSame topicAdvanced Mathematical Modeling in EngineeringFrench-language works237,207