Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper examines evolutionary nonlinear projection (NLP), a form of multidimensional scaling (MDS) performed with an evolutionary algorithm. MDS is a family of techniques for producing a low dimensional data set whose points have a one-to-one correspondence with the points of a higher dimensional data set with the added property that distances or dissimilarities in the higher dimensional space are preserved as much as possible in the lower dimensional space. The goal is typically visualization but may also be clustering or other forms of analysis. In this paper, we review current methods of NLP and go on to characterize NLP as an evolutionary computation problem, gaining insight into MDS as an optimization problem. Two different mutation operators, one introduced in this paper, are compared and parameter studies are performed on mutation rate and population size. The new mutation operator is found to be superior. NLP is found to be a problem where small population sizes exhibit superior performance. It is demonstrated experimentally that NLP is a multimodal optimization problem. Two broad classes of projection problems are identified, one of which yields consistent high-quality results and the other of which has many optima, all of low quality. A number of applications of the technique are presented, including projections of feature vectors for polyominos, of vectors that are members of an error correcting code, of behavioral assessments of a collection of agents, and of features derived from DNA sequences.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".