THE YEOMANRY OF ROBIN HOODAND SOCIAL TERMINOLOGY IN FIFTEENTH-CENTURY ENGLAND
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
'From the moment he first steps on the historical stage', wrote Barrie Dobson and John Taylor in 1976, 'Robin Hood is presented as a yeoman hero for a yeoman audience'. In the ballad of 'Robin \nHood and the Potter' the hero is twice identified as the personification of good yeomanry. But, as Dobson and Taylor have pointed out, the precise associations of yeoman status at different \ntimes and in different contexts are difficult to pin down. However, in their latest thoughts on the subject they reiterate that, by the time the earliest surviving versions of the tales were committed to writing, no later than the mid-fifteenth century, Robin Hood had emerged 'not only as a new sort of hero but as a hero for a \nnew and large social group, the yeomanry of England'. It was his association with that large, if ill-defined, section of society which \nprovided him with his most distinctive and enduring characteristics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it