MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2010342401 · doi:10.1080/13658810601079759

A shortest path algorithm with novel heuristics for dynamic transportation networks

2007· article· en· W2010342401 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Geographical Information Systems · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Management and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsMRF Geosystems (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeuristicsComputer scienceShortest path problemPath (computing)Process (computing)Yen's algorithmAlgorithmObject (grammar)Mathematical optimizationDijkstra's algorithmK shortest path routingArtificial intelligenceTheoretical computer scienceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Finding an optimal route in dynamic real‐time transportation networks is a critical problem for vehicle navigation. Existing approaches are either too complex or incapable of managing complex circumstances where both the location of a mobile object and traffic conditions change over time. In this paper, we propose an incremental search approach with novel heuristics based on a variation of the A* algorithm–Lifelong Planning A*. In addition, we suggest using an ellipse to prune the unnecessary nodes to be scanned in order to speed up the dynamic search process. The proposed algorithm determines the shortest‐cost path between a moving object and its destination by continually adapting to the dynamic traffic conditions, while making use of the previous search results. Experimental results evince that the proposed algorithm performs significantly better than the well‐known A* algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.887
Threshold uncertainty score0.510

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it