MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2010608198 · doi:10.1002/marc.200900445

Consideration of Macromonomer Reactions in <i>n</i>‐Butyl Acrylate Free Radical Polymerization

2009· article· en· W2010608198 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecular Rapid Communications · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMacromonomerPolymer chemistryAcrylateMonomerPolymerizationRadical polymerizationMaterials scienceIntermolecular forceSolution polymerizationMolar mass distributionPolymerButyl acrylateChemistryPolymer scienceOrganic chemistryComposite materialMolecule

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

n-Butyl acrylate (BA) starved-feed solution semibatch experiments with varying final polymer content and monomer feed times were carried out at 138 °C. A full mechanistic model of the system implemented in Predici includes intermolecular chain transfer to polymer and macromonomer propagation as well as backbiting, chain scission, and midchain radical propagation and termination. The importance of macromonomer propagation under these conditions of industrial interest is illustrated by experiment and simulation, with the macromonomer reaction responsible for the significant increase in polymer weight-average molecular weight ($\overline M _{\rm w}$) with time. Rate coefficients for macromonomer propagation (k(mac) ) and β-scission (k(β) ) of k(mac) /k(p) = 0.55 and k(β) = 12 s(-1) (with k(p) the rate coefficient for BA chain-end propagation) provide a good representation of experimental $\overline M _{\rm w}$ and macromonomer end group data at 138 °C.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.227
Threshold uncertainty score0.942

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it