Probabilistic Sequential Independent Components Analysis
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Under-complete models, which derive lower dimensional representations of input data, are valuable in domains in which the number of input dimensions is very large, such as data consisting of a temporal sequence of images. This paper presents the under-complete product of experts (UPoE), where each expert models a one-dimensional projection of the data. Maximum-likelihood learning rules for this model constitute a tractable and exact algorithm for learning under-complete independent components. The learning rules for this model coincide with approximate learning rules proposed earlier for under-complete independent component analysis (UICA) models. This paper also derives an efficient sequential learning algorithm from this model and discusses its relationship to sequential independent component analysis (ICA), projection pursuit density estimation, and feature induction algorithms for additive random field models. This paper demonstrates the efficacy of these novel algorithms on high-dimensional continuous datasets.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it