MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

210Pb IN HOME DUST AS A POSSIBLE MARKER FOR RADON EXPOSURE IN INDOOR AIR

2008· article· en· W2010985514 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueHealth Physics · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicRadioactivity and Radon Measurements
Canadian institutionsHealth Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadonEnvironmental scienceIndoor airDecay productEnvironmental chemistryAtmospheric sciencesIndoor air qualityRadon exposureHealth hazardEnvironmental healthEnvironmental engineeringChemistryPhysicsMedicineNuclear physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Exposure to indoor radon is of great concern because it is an environmental hazard for developing lung cancer. 210Pb, a radon decay product, was measured in home dust samples from the city of Ottawa, Canada. The 210Pb level in dust ranged from 33 to 352 Bq kg(-1), with the geometric mean and median values of 105 and 110 Bq kg(-1), respectively. Despite the complexity of the formation of 210Pb in the indoor environment, an encouraging correlation between 210Pb concentrations in home dust and radon levels in indoor air was observed when the measurement data were grouped according to four geographic regions of the city. This observation could lead to the development of 210Pb in home dust as a potential marker for indoor radon exposure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.909

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.125
GPT teacher head0.415
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it