MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2010990056 · doi:10.1002/lite.201000054

Monitoring fish oil volatiles to assess the quality of fish oil

2010· article· en· W2010990056 on OpenAlexaff
Jenna C. Sullivan, Suzanne M. Budge

Bibliographic record

VenueLipid Technology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFish oilFish <Actinopterygii>Solid-phase microextractionSensory systemChemistrySensory analysisEnvironmental scienceFood scienceGas chromatography–mass spectrometryFisheryBiologyChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The fish oil industry is continuously growing; however there is a lack of analytical methods to assess fish oil quality that correlate with the results obtained through sensory testing. Solid phase microextraction (SPME) provides a means to monitor the concentration of oxidative volatiles in fish oil. Because volatile oxidation products are responsible for the off‐flavours found in oxidized fish oil, this technique may be used as a substitute for sensory panels. Principal component analysis (PCA), combined with sensory panels, can be used to determine the oxidation products that are most correlated with degradation of the sensory properties of the oil. This creates the potential for development of methods that can determine when the sensory qualities of oil have deteriorated beyond an acceptable level.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLipid TechnologySame topicAdvanced Chemical Sensor TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207