MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2011113904 · doi:10.1515/hf.2006.005

Rapid analysis of transgenic trees using transmittance near-infrared spectroscopy (NIR)

2006· article· en· W2011113904 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueHolzforschung · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBiofuel production and bioconversion
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsTransmittanceLigninSpectroscopyNear-infrared spectroscopyXyloseMaterials scienceCelluloseFourier transform infrared spectroscopyInfrared spectroscopyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChemistryChemical engineeringChromatographyOpticsOptoelectronicsFood scienceOrganic chemistryFermentation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Genetic engineering of trees has generated a large amount of interest in the development of highly improved transgenic trees. To efficiently monitor and control the properties of the transgenic products, a rapid, mini-scale analytical method is required. Transmittance near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy was chosen as a fast analysis tool for characterizing the chemical properties of the transgenic products. Pellets were prepared from 75 mg of wood meal and directly scanned using transmittance NIR spectroscopy. Very strong correlations were obtained between the NIR data and conventional wet-chemistry results for the lignin content, S/G ratio, cellulose and xylose content. The results indicate that transmittance NIR is a powerful tool for determining and screening the chemical properties of transgenic trees.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.242
Threshold uncertainty score0.660

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it