A Framework for Automatic Resource Provisioning for Private Clouds
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A private cloud is maintained by an enterprise forits internal use. In such a scenario instead of buying the resources the enterprise can acquire the resources from a public cloud such as the ones provided by Amazon and Microsoft. On conventional systems rigorous analysis of the system and its workload is performed for determining the appropriate number of resources to be deployed on the private cloud. This paper presents a middleware framework that avoids this step of a priori capacity analysis and allows such private cloud owners to provision resources automatically such that a specified grade of service is maintained. The proposed framework performs dynamic resource provisioning that also leads to a reduction of operational cost. Additional resources are acquired during high traffic periods and released during low traffic periods such that the desired grade of service is always maintained. The paper describes the architecture of the framework and the experience gained from a prototype implementation including a preliminary analysis of its performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it