A backtracking LR algorithm for parsing ambiguous context-dependent languages
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Parsing context-dependent computer languages requires an ability to maintain and query data structures while parsing for the purpose of influencing the parse. Parsing ambiguous computer languages requires an ability to generate a parser for arbitrary context-free grammars. In both cases we have tools for generating parsers from a grammar. However, languages that have both of these properties simultaneously are much more difficult to parse. Consequently, we have fewer techniques. One approach to parsing such languages is to endow traditional LR systems with backtracking. This is a step towards a working solution, however there are number of problems. In this work we present two enhancements to a basic backtracking LR approach which enable the parsing of computer languages that are both context-dependent and ambiguous. Using our system we have produced a fast parser for C++ that is composed of strictly a scanner, a name lookup stage and parser generated from a grammar augmented with semantic actions and semantic 'undo' actions. Language ambiguities are resolved by prioritizing grammar declarations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it