MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2011643805 · doi:10.1080/0194262x.2013.876569

Analysis for Science Librarians of the 2013 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine: The Work of J.E. Rothman, R.W. Schekman, and T.C. Südhof

2014· article· en· W2011643805 on OpenAlexaff
Andrea Miller-Nesbitt

Bibliographic record

VenueScience & Technology Libraries · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCellular transport and secretion
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysiologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The traffic inside a single cell has been described as “… complicated as rush hour near any metropolitan area” (Howard Hughes Medical Institute 2013a). What this year’s three winners of the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine have done is describe how molecules are able to read molecular traffic signs, enabling them to navigate the heavy intracellular traffic—a fundamental process in cellular physiology (Howard Hughes Medical Institute 2013a). This article gives an overview of the work of James Rothman, Randy Schekman, and Thomas Südhof, the 2013 Nobel laureates in Physiology and Medicine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.036
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.968
Threshold uncertainty score0.265

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.036
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0110.010
Science and technology studies0.0110.005
Scholarly communication0.0320.017
Open science0.0010.012
Research integrity0.0040.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0790.055

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScience & Technology LibrariesSame topicCellular transport and secretionFrench-language works237,207