The Role of Complex Formation between the Escherichia coli Hydrogenase Accessory Factors HypB and SlyD
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Escherichia coli protein SlyD is a member of the FK-506-binding protein family of peptidylprolyl isomerases. In addition to its peptidylprolyl isomerase domain, SlyD is composed of a molecular chaperone domain and a C-terminal tail rich in potential metal-binding residues. SlyD interacts with the [NiFe]-hydrogenase accessory protein HypB and contributes to nickel insertion during biosynthesis of the hydrogenase metallocenter. This study examines the HypB-SlyD complex and its significance in hydrogenase activation. Protein variants were prepared to delineate the interface between HypB and SlyD. Complex formation requires the HypB linker region located between the high affinity N-terminal Ni(II) site and the GTPase domain of the protein. In the case of SlyD, the deletion of a short loop in the chaperone domain abrogates the interaction with HypB. Mutations in either protein that disrupt complex formation in vitro also result in deficient hydrogenase production in vivo, indicating that the contact between HypB and SlyD is important for hydrogenase maturation. Surprisingly, SlyD stimulates release of nickel from the high affinity Ni(II)-binding site of HypB, an activity that is also disrupted by mutations that affect complex formation. Furthermore, a SlyD truncation lacking the C-terminal metal-binding tail still interacts with HypB but is deficient in stimulating metal release and is not functional in vivo. These results suggest that SlyD could activate metal release from HypB during metallation of the [NiFe] hydrogenase.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".