MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2011685880 · doi:10.1109/tpds.2012.205

SyRaFa: Synchronous Rate and Frequency Adjustment for Utilization Control in Distributed Real-Time Embedded Systems

2012· article· en· W2011685880 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicReal-Time Systems Scheduling
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les TechnologiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Nebraska-Lincoln
KeywordsComputer scienceWorkloadSetpointAsynchronous communicationFrequency scalingTask (project management)Synchronization (alternating current)Distributed computingMulti-core processorQuality of serviceReal-time computingParallel computingComputer networkOperating systemEnergy consumption

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To efficiently utilize the computing resources and provide good quality of service (QoS) to the end-to-end tasks in the distributed real-time systems, we can enforce the utilization bounds on multiple processors. The utilization control is challenging especially when the workload in the system is unpredictable. To handle the workload uncertainties, current research favors feedback control techniques, and recent work combines the task rate adaptation and processor frequency scaling in an asynchronous way for CPU utilization control, where task rates and the processor frequencies are tuned asynchronously in two decoupled control loops for control convenience. Since the two manipulated variables, task rates and processor frequencies, contribute to the CPU utilizations together with strong coupling, adjusting them asynchronously may degrade the utilization control performance. In this paper, we provide a novel scheme to make synchronous rate and frequency adjustment to enforce the utilization setpoint, referred to as SyRaFa scheme. SyRaFa can handle the workload uncertainties by identifying the system model online and can simultaneously adjust the manipulated variables by solving an optimization problem in each sampling period. Extensive evaluation results demonstrate SyRaFa outperforms the existing schemes especially under severe workload uncertainties.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.979
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it