Numerical Simulation of Transient Heat Transfer in a Protective Clothing System during a Flash Fire Exposure
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A finite volume model was developed to simulate the transient heat transfer in a protective clothing system. The model domain consists of a fire-resistant fabric, the human skin, and the air gap between the fabric and the skin. The model uses a more sophisticated treatment of the air gap compared to previous models: it accounts for transient combined conduction-radiation heat transfer within the air gap and includes the variation in the air gap properties with temperature. Predictions were obtained for the temperature and heat flux distributions in the fabric, skin, and air gap as a function of time, as well as the time to receive skin burn injuries. The numerical model was used to explore the physics of heat transfer in protective clothing, which could potentially be used to improve the performance of this clothing. This study illustrates the dependence of the temporal behavior of the heat fluxes on the specific model assumptions, as well as the associated sensitivity of skin burn predictions to these as...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it