Evaluating Hypotheses for the Transfer of Stimulus Particles to Jacobson's Organ in Snakes
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Six hypotheses for transfer mechanisms to the sensory epithelium of Jacobson's organ are presented: diffusion, capillary action, ciliary currents, pinocytotic currents, direct tongue insertion, and suction. Of these, diffusion and capillary action are rejected on theoretical grounds, and ciliary and pinocytic currents are seen as playing, at best, a secondary role. Of the two remaining hypotheses, direct insertion of the tongue and suction, experimental evidence is summarized that leads to the rejection of the direct insertion hypothesis. The stimulus transfer mechanism is hypothesized to involve the generation of suction within the lumen of Jacobson's organ and its duct. It is proposed that this suction is produced by pressure from the tongue and/or the anterior lingual processes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it