A numerical study into lateral cyclic nonlinear soil–pile response
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pile foundations are generally designed to resist both axial and lateral loads. Under lateral cyclic loading, the response of the pile foundation is affected by factors such as soil and pile yielding, gapping, and soil cave-in. These factors directly influence the effective lateral stiffness and strength of the foundation and can govern the design. In this paper, two case studies of single piles, one in clay and one in sand, are used to examine the influence of the aforementioned factors on nonlinear cyclic response of piles. The numerical study is conducted using a recently developed beam on a nonlinear Winkler foundation (BNWF) model. The results of the study point to the important role soil cave-in and recompression play in the cyclic soil–pile response, and elucidate how this could particularly be beneficial to piles that develop plastic hinges below ground level.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it