MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2012044160 · doi:10.1002/cssc.201390000

Cover Picture: The Effect of Switchable Water Additives on Clay Settling (ChemSusChem 1/2013)

2013· paratext· en· W2012044160 on OpenAlexaff
Chien‐Shun Chen, Ying Yin Lau, Sean M. Mercer, Tobias Robert, J. Hugh Horton, Philip G. Jessop

Bibliographic record

VenueChemSusChem · 2013
Typeparatext
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSettlingAqueous solutionIonic strengthChemical engineeringMaterials scienceIonic bondingChemistryEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental engineeringIonOrganic chemistryEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The cover picture illustrates the use of switchable water, an aqueous solution with a CO2-switchable ionic strength, to expedite the settling of clay solids without making the process water permanently salty. In strip mining operations, the settling of fine solids such as clay particles from aqueous suspensions is often a time- and material-intensive process. In their Full paper on page 132, Horton and Jessop describe how calcium salts can be used to promote the settling of the solids; however, the liberated salts must then be desalinated before recycling. Using switchable water, the introduction of CO2 increases the ionic strength of the aqueous solution by reacting with an amine additive, thus promoting clay settling. The later removal of CO2 from the liberated water decreases the ionic strength, allowing the water to be recycled.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.105
Threshold uncertainty score0.351

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1050.026

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemSusChemSame topicMethane Hydrates and Related PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207