MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2012044160 · doi:10.1002/cssc.201390000

Cover Picture: The Effect of Switchable Water Additives on Clay Settling (ChemSusChem 1/2013)

2013· paratext· en· W2012044160 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueChemSusChem · 2013
Typeparatext
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSettlingAqueous solutionIonic strengthChemical engineeringMaterials scienceIonic bondingChemistryEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental engineeringIonOrganic chemistryEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The cover picture illustrates the use of switchable water, an aqueous solution with a CO2-switchable ionic strength, to expedite the settling of clay solids without making the process water permanently salty. In strip mining operations, the settling of fine solids such as clay particles from aqueous suspensions is often a time- and material-intensive process. In their Full paper on page 132, Horton and Jessop describe how calcium salts can be used to promote the settling of the solids; however, the liberated salts must then be desalinated before recycling. Using switchable water, the introduction of CO2 increases the ionic strength of the aqueous solution by reacting with an amine additive, thus promoting clay settling. The later removal of CO2 from the liberated water decreases the ionic strength, allowing the water to be recycled.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.440
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1300.092

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it