MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2012502327 · doi:10.1109/iros.2013.6696833

Underwater stereo SLAM with refraction correction

2013· article· en· W2012502327 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpipolar geometryComputer visionArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceUnderwaterStereoscopySimultaneous localization and mappingRefractionTracingPixelRay tracing (physics)CalibrationGeologyOpticsImage (mathematics)MathematicsMobile robotRobotPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work presents a method for underwater stereo localization and mapping for detailed inspection tasks. The method generates dense, geometrically accurate reconstructions of underwater environments by compensating for image distortions due to refraction. A refractive model of the camera and enclosure is calculated offline using calibration images and produces non-linear epipolar curves for use in stereo matching. An efficient block matching algorithm traverses the precalculated epipolar curves to find pixel correspondences and depths are calculated using pixel ray tracing. Finally the depth maps are used to perform dense simultaneous localization and mapping to generate a 3D model of the environment. The localization and mapping algorithm incorporates refraction corrected ray tracing to improve map quality. The method is shown to improve overall depth map quality over existing methods and to generate high quality 3-D reconstructions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.830
Threshold uncertainty score0.454

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.163
Teacher spread0.158 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRobotics and Sensor-Based LocalizationFrench-language works237,207