MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2012601445 · doi:10.1016/j.anihpc.2003.07.002

Hardy–Sobolev critical elliptic equations with boundary singularities

2004· article· en· W2012601445 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnales de l Institut Henri Poincaré C Analyse Non Linéaire · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicNonlinear Partial Differential Equations
Canadian institutionsPacific Institute for the Mathematical SciencesUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSobolev spaceGravitational singularityMathematicsBoundary (topology)Mathematical analysisElliptic curve

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Unlike the non-singular case s=0 , or the case when 0 belongs to the interior of a domain Ω in ℝ^n ( n⩾3 ), we show that the value and the attainability of the best Hardy–Sobolev constant on a smooth domain Ω , \mu _{s}(\Omega ): = \inf \left\{\int \limits_{\Omega }\left|\nabla u\right|^{2}dx;u∊H_{0}^{1}(\Omega )\text{ and }\int \limits_{\Omega }\frac{\left|u\right|^{2*(s)}}{\left|x\right|^{s}} = 1\right\} when 0<s<2 , 2^∗(s)=\frac{2(n - s)}{n - 2} , and when 0 is on the boundary ∂Ω are closely related to the properties of the curvature of ∂Ω at 0. These conditions on the curvature are also relevant to the study of elliptic partial differential equations with singular potentials of the form: - \Delta u = \frac{u^{p - 1}}{\left|x\right|^{s}} + f(x,u)\text{ in }\Omega \subset ℝ^{n}, where f is a lower order perturbative term at infinity and f(x,0)=0 . We show that the positivity of the sectional curvature at 0 is relevant when dealing with Dirichlet boundary conditions, while the Neumann problems seem to require the positivity of the mean curvature at 0. Résumé Contrairement au cas non-singulier s=0 , ou au cas d’une singularité à l’intérieur d’ un domaine Ω de ℝ^n ( n⩾3 ), on montre que la valeur de la meilleure constante dans l’inégalité de Hardy–Sobolev sur un domaine régulier, \mu _{s}(\Omega ): = \inf \left\{\int \limits_{\Omega }\left|\nabla u\right|^{2}dx;u∊H_{0}^{1}(\Omega )\text{ et }\int \limits_{\Omega }\frac{\left|u\right|^{2*(s)}}{\left|x\right|^{s}} = 1\right\} quand 0<s<2 , 2^∗(s)=\frac{2(n - s)}{n - 2} , et quand 0 appartient à la frontière, est étroitement liée aux propriétés de la courbure de ∂Ω en 0. Ces mêmes conditions sur la courbure sont aussi pertinentes pour l’existence de solutions d’équations à potentiel singulier de la forme : - \Delta u = \frac{u^{p - 1}}{\left|x\right|^{s}} + f(x,u)\text{ in }\Omega \subset ℝ^{n}, où f est une perturbation d’ordre inférieur à l’infini et f(x,0)=0 . On montre que la positivité de la courbure sectionelle est suffisante pour l’existence de solutions des problèmes avec conditions de Dirichlet au bord, tandis que pour les problèmes de Neumann, c’est la positivité de la coubure moyenne qui compte.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.514
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it