MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2012719569 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2005.1578060

Pilot symbols for channel estimation in OFDM systems

2005· article· en· W2012719569 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGLOBECOM '05. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, 2005. · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEstimatorOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingAlgorithmChannel (broadcasting)Cramér–Rao boundComputer scienceMinimum mean square errorGaussianMathematicsImpulse responseStatisticsMathematical optimizationTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider superimposing pilot symbols on to data symbols for channel estimation for orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) systems. We first derive maximum-likelihood (ML) and minimum-mean square error (MMSE) iterative channel estimators. Modeling the time domain signal as Gaussian, we derive an ML channel estimator by averaging the likelihood function for both data and channel impulse response (CIR) over the resulting Gaussian vector. Two data detectors are also proposed by eliminating the CIR from the likelihood function. The resulting integer least squares problem can be efficiently solved using a sphere decoder (SD). Furthermore, the Cramer-Rao bound (CRB) for the superimposed channel and data estimation is derived. The equispaced pilot placement is optimal in superimposed training. The ideal performance benchmarks are reached by our proposed estimators. Their performance is comparable to that of a separated training scheme, but they offer a higher data rate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.894
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it