Regression Analysis with Covariates Missing at Random: A Piece-wise Nonparametric Model for Missing Covariates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Statistical analysis for the regression model f β(y | x, z) with missing values in the covariate vector X requires modeling of the covariate distribution g(x | z). Likelihood methods, including Ibrahim (1990 Ibrahim , J. G. ( 1990 ). Incomplete data in generalized linear models . J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 85 : 765 – 769 .[Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]), Chen (2004 Chen , H. Y. (2004). Nonparametric and semiparametric models for missing covariates in parametric regression. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 99:1176–1189.[Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]), and Zhao (2005 Zhao , Y. ( 2005 ). Design and Efficient Estimation in Regression Analysis with Missing Data in Two-Phase Studies. Ph.D. thesis , University of Waterloo . [Google Scholar]), need either X or Z to be discrete. This article considers extending the likelihood methods to deal with cases where both X and Z may be continuous. We propose modeling the covariate distribution g(x | z) using a piece-wise nonparametric model, then a maximum likelihood estimate (MLE) of β can be computed following the maximum likelihood estimating procedure of Chen (2004 Chen , H. Y. (2004). Nonparametric and semiparametric models for missing covariates in parametric regression. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 99:1176–1189.[Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) or Zhao (2005 Zhao , Y. ( 2005 ). Design and Efficient Estimation in Regression Analysis with Missing Data in Two-Phase Studies. Ph.D. thesis , University of Waterloo . [Google Scholar]). The resulting estimation method is easy to implement and the asymptotic properties of the MLE follow under certain conditions. Extensive simulation studies for different models indicate that the proposed method is acceptable for practical implementation. A real data example is used to illustrate the method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.049 | 0.128 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.010 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".