MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Unfulfilled Prophecy

2000· article· en· W2012826177 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Higher Education · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation Systems and Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical sciencePsychologySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Dramatic changes have occurred in the scale of investment in employee education in the United States and Canada since the end of World War II. Business and industry leaders in the United States and Canada have recognized that an educated workforce is essential to remaining competitive in a global economy. At the same time, there is widespread dissatisfaction with the knowledge and skills of graduates of the public educational system, which has led to efforts to provide remedial education. In addition, technological advances require reeducation of employees to maintain their competence. Corporations also see employee education programs as a means to reduce costs associated with employee turnover and absenteeism (Allen, 1996). In 1997, organizations in the United States with 100 or more employees were expected to spend almost $60 billion for employee education (Training budgets, 1997). This estimate does not include the costs of informal on-the-job education, nor does it include indirect costs, such as the wages and benefits paid to employees while they are participating in educational programs. Souque (1996) reported that a survey of Canadian organizations found that employers are spending 1.6% of payroll on training and development for their employees. He reported that a recent survey in the United States reported a comparable figure of 1.5%. Davis and Botkin (1994) have argued that business is now becoming more responsible than government for the kind of education that will maintain competitiveness, from the development of basic skills to sophisticated professional development programs. They describe the development of corporate universities and note that although some of these are little more than rechristened training centers, they nonetheless reflect a growing commitment to employee education. Meister (1994) profiled education practices of 30 U. S. corporations that have established universities, including Arthur Andersen, Federal Express, General Electric, and Motorola. She noted that many corporations assist their employees who complete education programs to obtain academic credit toward university degrees. The American Council on Education Program on Noncollegiate Sponsored Instruction (ACE/PONSI) evaluates instructional courses and programs offered by business and industry, labor union s, professional and voluntary associations, and government agencies and makes recommendations for college credit based upon such instruction. ACE/PONSI was initiated in 1974, and today over 250 companies and organizations, including ATT Eurich, 1985; Hawthorne, Libby & Nash, 1983; Nash & Hawthorne, 1987; Porter, 1982). …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.363
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.382
Teacher spread0.354 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it