Effect of Surface Photoreactions on the Photocoloration of a Wide Band Gap Metal Oxide: Probing Whether Surface Reactions Are Photocatalytic
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A nonphotocatalytic reaction occurring on the surface of an irradiated wide band gap metal oxide, such as ZrO2, can affect the process of photoinduced formation of Zr3+, F- and V-type color centers. The effect of such reactions is seen as the influence of photostimulated adsorption on the photocoloration of the metal oxide specimen. In particular, photoadsorption of electron donor molecules leads to an increase of electron color centers, whereas photoadsorption of electron acceptor molecules leads to an increase of hole color centers. Monitoring the photocoloration of a metal oxide during a surface photochemical reaction probes whether the reaction is photocatalytic: accordingly, the influence of simple photoreactions on the photocoloration of ZrO2, reactions that involved the photoreduction of molecular oxygen, the photooxidation of molecular hydrogen, the photooxidation of hydrogen by adsorbed oxygen, and the photoinduced transformation of ammonia and carbon dioxide. Kinetics of the photoprocesses are reported, as well as the photoinduced chesorluminscence (PhICL effect) of ammonia. Thermoprogrammed desorption and mass spectral monitoring of the photoreaction involving NH3 identified hydrazine as an intermediate and molecular nitrogen as the final product. The photoreactions involving NH3 and CO2 are nonphotocatalytic processes, in contrast to the photooxidation of hydrogen which is photocatalytic. Carbon dioxide and carbonate radical anions are formed by interaction of CO2 with Zr3+ centers and hole states (OS-*), respectively. Mechanistic implications are discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it