MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2013220409 · doi:10.3138/tjt.20.1.7

Creating a Canadian Religious Tradition: Conceiving the Ukrainian Orthodox Church in Canada

2004· article· en· W2013220409 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueToronto Journal of Theology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUkrainianJurisdictionPoliticsImmigrationPolitical scienceMetropolitan areaWorld War IIAncient historyEthnologyHistoryLawArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The first settlers of Ukrainian origin on the Canadian Prairies were Ivan Pylypiv and Wasyl Eleniak, arriving in the fall of 1891. They and the subsequent tens of thousands were, in the main, from the western portion of contemporary Ukraine known as Halychyna (oftentimes termed Galicia). This territory, which until the end of World War II was dominated by Polish cultural and political influences, was overwhelmingly Ukrainian (Greek) Catholic. By 1911, of the approximately 120,000 Ukrainians in Canada, only somewhere around 25,000 were Orthodox, primarily Bukovinians and under the jurisdiction of the Russian Orthodox Metropolitan of North America. Although the immigration was predominantly Ukrainian Catholic, that very community in 1918 gave birth to a uniquely Canadian Prairie creation in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan: the Ukrainian Greek Orthodox Church of Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.844
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it