MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2013314665 · doi:10.1021/ac101495m

Silver Nanoparticles on a Plastic Platform for Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance Biosensing

2010· letter· en· W2013314665 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnalytical Chemistry · 2010
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiosensorSurface plasmon resonanceChemistryStreptavidinNanotechnologyAdsorptionNanoparticlePolyethylene terephthalateSilver nanoparticleFabricationDetection limitChromatographyMaterials scienceBiotinOrganic chemistryComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A cost-effective fabrication method for the preparation of localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) biosensors supported on plastics is described. The silver-nanoparticles-on-plastic sensor (SNOPS) was fabricated by chemically modifying the surface of a common plastic, polyethylene terephthalate (PET) to allow the efficient immobilization of Ag NPs. The LSPR of the SNOPS strip showed good sample-to-sample reproducibility. The analytical performance of the sensor strips for monitoring both thiol and protein adsorption, including bioaffinity, was examined. The limit of quantification to the adsorption of 11-mercaptoundecanoic acid was 500 nM and for the detection of streptavidin was approximately 9.5 nM. SNOPS can then be used as a cheap, versatile, and yet sensitive LSPR biosensor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.116
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it