MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2013989638 · doi:10.1353/tech.0.0465

How Cities Won the West: Four Centuries of Urban Change in Western North America (review)

2010· article· en· W2013989638 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTechnology and Culture · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrbanization and City Planning
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmerican westImmigrationGeographyHistoryQuarter (Canadian coin)Power (physics)Economic historyEthnologyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: How Cities Won the West: Four Centuries of Urban Change in Western North America David Wrobel (bio) How Cities Won the West: Four Centuries of Urban Change in Western North America. By Carl Abbott. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 2008. Pp. x+347. $34.95. Carl Abbott's tenth book (excluding several textbooks) is a bold, broad, synthetic study that draws on his monographic studies on urban boosterism, Sunbelt cities, Pacific Northwest cities, and the twentieth-century western urban experience. Well-illustrated with promotional maps and posters, photographs, and charts (for example, of "Tall Buildings in North Plains Cities"), How Cities Won the West is Abbott's biggest book in terms of sweep, scope, synthetic power, and significance. This is both a macro-scale and highly detailed work, a study that scholars of the modern urban West sorely need, just as they needed Walter Nugent's study of migration, Into the West (1999), and Elliott Barkan's study of how immigration has shaped the West, From All Points (2007). And, while comparisons with such people-centered studies might seem out of place for an urban history, Abbott's book is very much concerned with what cities mean to the people who live in them and to those who visit them. The urban horizons of the American West have not before been painted with such clarity and complexity and I'm not sure that anyone who reads this work can ever think of the West's wide-open spaces the same way again. To the Edward Abbey types who love a good sojourn with nature and measure quality of experience in terms of the absence of people, those spaces may seem like the heart and soul of the western macro region. But as Abbott reminds us again and again in this book—not directly, and certainly not in preachy or pedantic fashion—those open spaces lie between urban places, and it is those urban places that have shaped the history, the culture, the economics, and the politics of the West; they are the Wests that really matter. Abbott emphasizes three themes: first, that western cities grew as central and centralizing points; second, that the cumulative rebalancing of western North America has been ongoing and vital, that the U.S. population has been tilting westward—more specifically, tilting into western urban centers—for centuries; and third, that western cities have transitioned from their roles as "imitators of eastern culture and outposts of eastern capital to innovators that compete with [East Coast cities and Chicago] as centers of economic, social, and intellectual change" (p. 10). Abbott examines three phases of city development—preindustrial, industrial, and postindustrial—and his keyword, in addition to metropolis and region, is connections. Readers are introduced to a truly thorough and inspired exploration of the connective tissue that ties western urban North America and the rest of the world together. [End Page 508] Abbott's book is marked by none of the lingering inferiority complexes that have characterized much scholarship on the urban West. Quite the contrary, he is careful to avoid untrammeled boosterism and to illuminate examples of that phenomenon in the last two centuries. His introductory chapter is "All Roads Lead to Fresno"—Fresno's boosters in 1901 imagined it as the urban nerve center of the nation and the world, just as those of Boise, Idaho, did a generation earlier, and those of Casper, Wyoming, did two generations later. Abbott thus subtly connects Fresno and Boise and Casper to Edmonton and Winnipeg and Calgary in a process that seems uncannily organic, never forced. Each chapter is marked by this thematic coherence and by an impressive web of connections. The end result is the most comprehensive and sophisticated study of the modern urban West to date and one that is marked by an approach we might label urban anthropomorphization. Perhaps it's the familial-structure metaphors that are used to connect cities: "Victoria, perched at the tip of an island with access to an expansive range of straits and bays, was a conifer-encircled cousin of Singapore" (p. 58); or Abbott's propensity for quoting those descriptions of cities that seem to best capture...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.908
Threshold uncertainty score0.563

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it