MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2014190703 · doi:10.1145/1830483.1830683

Parallel FPGA-based implementation of scatter search

2010· article· en· W2014190703 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMetaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSpeedupField-programmable gate arrayHeuristicsParallel computingSoftwareParallelism (grammar)PopulationHeuristicComputer engineeringComputer architectureComputer hardwareProgramming languageArtificial intelligenceOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Scatter Search [1] is an effective and established population-based meta-heuristic that has been used to solve a variety of hard optimization problems. However, like most population-based meta-heuristics, the time required to find high-quality solutions can become prohibitive as problem sizes grow. In this paper, we present a hardware implementation of scatter search on a Field-Programmable Gate-Array (FPGA). Our objective is to improve the runtime of scatter search by exploiting the potentially massive performance benefits that are available through the native parallelism in hardware. When implementing scatter search we employ Handel-C [2] - a programming language specifically designed to enable software developers to easily synthesize C-like programs into synchronous hardware. As far as we know, this is the first time that scatter search has been implemented in hardware (of any form). Our empirical results show that by effectively exploiting data parallelism and pipelining a 28x speedup over software can be achieved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.859
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it