MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2014390817 · doi:10.1109/ssp.2009.5278511

A constrained maximum-likelihood approach for efficient multipath mitigation in GNSS receivers

2009· article· en· W2014390817 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue2009 IEEE/SP 15th Workshop on Statistical Signal Processing · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGNSS positioning and interference
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultipath mitigationGNSS applicationsMultipath propagationComputer scienceLagrange multiplierMathematical optimizationSIGNAL (programming language)AlgorithmConstrained optimizationLikelihood functionElectronic engineeringEstimation theoryMathematicsTelecommunicationsGlobal Positioning SystemEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we develop a new method for mitigating multipath effects in GNSS receivers, based on a constrained maximum-likelihood (CML) estimates of the multipath parameters. First, we apply a nonlinear transformation on the signal parameters to reduce the search space. Then, we define a new criterion for constraining the relative amplitude of the received secondary signal, and use the Lagrange multiplier method to solve the CML optimization problem. The resulting likelihood cost function has a unique minimum and yields to closed-form parameters estimates. The proposed method does not suffer from the correlation multi-peak problem, as for the standard discriminators, thus it can be used for any type of GNSS signal to mitigate both code and carrier phase multipath errors, including the new BOC signals. Numerical examples show that the CML approach gives a significant refinement to reach the optimal positioning solution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.909
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it