MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2014575978 · doi:10.1081/jfp-120015487

QUANTITATIVE QUALITY TESTS FOR FISH MEAL. II. AN INVESTIGATION OF THE QUALITY OF SOUTH AFRICAN FISH MEALS AND THE VALIDITY OF A NUMBER OF CHEMICAL QUALITY INDICES

2002· article· en· W2014575978 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Food Properties · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMeat and Animal Product Quality
Canadian institutionsCanadian Society of Intestinal Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuality (philosophy)Fish <Actinopterygii>Fish mealFood scienceMathematicsStatisticsBiologyFisheryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT This report indicates that the quality of fish meal can conveniently be expressed by two independent indices: a pre-processing spoilage index and a heat abuse index. It is shown that indices of spoilage such as total volatile basic nitrogen (TVBN) or free fatty acid (FFA) can be misleading. As an additional quality index the phospholipid (PL) content is suggested. This index measures the PL content of the residual lipids in the meal and allows the quality of the dried presscake to be assessed separately from the added stickwater. The polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) content of the meal lipids is also an excellent guide for detecting heat abuse during drying of the meal. Using this measurement no evidence was found to conclude that steam (indirect) dryers cause more heat damage to meals than flame (direct) dryers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.309
Threshold uncertainty score0.335

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.284
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.068 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it