MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2014758539 · doi:10.1080/21520844.2011.576452

The Troubled Waters of Africa: Piracy in the African Littoral

2011· article· en· W2014758539 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Middle East and Africa · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMaritime Security and History
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHarmInefficiencyDevelopment economicsGlobePoliticsDistribution (mathematics)MainstreamResource (disambiguation)Political economyResource distributionPolitical scienceEconomicsLawResource allocationMarket economyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In contrast to almost any other part of the globe, piracy off Africa has the potential to harm the continent's growth prospects adversely. This article seeks to identify the characteristics of piracy that are peculiar to Africa. It reviews piracy's recent history using the author's established analytical framework before examining the two most serious outbreaks—those off Somalia and Nigeria—in greater depth. It argues that piracy is the seaward manifestation of domestic economic inefficiency, inequitable resource distribution, and conflict before suggestion why and how the problem might spread to new areas by feeding on, and in turn feeding, political disruption and economic marginalization. It concludes by suggesting that given the continent's dependence on resource exports through a limited number of ports and across waters that most states are unable to secure effectively, continuing failure to address these security shortcomings could retard development goals miring millions in continuing misery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.611
Threshold uncertainty score0.747

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.107
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.126 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it