MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2014864634 · doi:10.1109/mpel.2014.2312275

Electric Motors in Electrified Transportation: A step toward achieving a sustainable and highly efficient transportation system

2014· article· en· W2014864634 on OpenAlexaff
Berker Bilgin, Ali Emadi

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Power Electronics Magazine · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Motor Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutomotive industryAutomotive engineeringTraction motorInternal combustion engineElectric motorTraction (geology)Automotive engineBattery electric vehicleEfficient energy useFossil fuelElectric vehicleEngineeringMechanical engineeringElectrical engineeringWaste management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The transportation sector is one of the largest energy users, and the main source of energy in our transportation system is still fossil fuels. As an example, in the United States, 98% of transportation energy comes from oil, but most of it is wasted due to the low efficiency of con-ventional internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles. To-day's low fuel efficiencies make the automotive industry one of largest sources of greenhouse gas emissions. In this article, the multidisciplinary nature of electric traction motors is investigated and related design issues are presented for interior permanent magnet (PM), induction, and switched reluctance machines (SRMs). These are the commonly considered machine types for traction applications, although the PM machine is the most widely used type in currently available electrified vehicles. The operating principles of these machines were also be explained.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations116
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Power Electronics MagazineSame topicElectric Motor Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207