MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2015188563 · doi:10.1109/joe.2012.2227538

Sharpening Sidescan Sonar Images for Shallow-Water Target and Habitat Classification With a Vertically Stacked Array

2013· article· en· W2015188563 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicUnderwater Acoustics Research
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBeamformingMultipath propagationBeamwidthAcousticsSonarSIGNAL (programming language)GeologyInterference (communication)Computer scienceSynthetic aperture sonarRemote sensingAdaptive beamformerTelecommunicationsAntenna (radio)Channel (broadcasting)Physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sidescan imagery is commonly used to provide a 2-D real-time “look” at the seafloor in high resolution. In shallow-water environments, however, interference from surface scattering and from multipath signals may deteriorate the quality of the sidescan images to the point where target detection and classification are no longer achievable. This paper investigates the extent to which this interference may be suppressed by a small array which employs across-track beamforming. A sidescan array utilizing a vertical stack of six receive elements was constructed, and is shown to be effective at providing a clear view of the seafloor when surface and multipath interference is present. A theoretical analysis examines the relative path strengths of the received signals for different across-track beam patterns, and examines how these signals are affected when beamforming is applied on transmit and/or receive. Shadow contrast reduction caused by the along-track beamwidth is also considered for different along-track beam patterns and different target widths. A simulator was created to illustrate the impact of interference contributing to the received signal, and to show how the received signal is affected when beamforming is applied. The across-track beam patterns of the experimental array were measured, and these data are used to enhance the theoretical and simulated predictions of received signal strength. Experimental data are also presented in which a sidescan image, heavily contaminated by interference, is significantly improved using across-track beamforming. It is concluded that a vertically stacked multielement sidescan sonar which employs across-track beamforming on receive is a valuable tool for suppressing the multipath and surface interference which arise in shallow-water surveys.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.683
Threshold uncertainty score0.326

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it