Optimization and Pseudospectra, with Applications to Robust Stability
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The $\epsilon$-pseudospectrum of a matrix A is the subset of the complex plane consisting of all eigenvalues of all complex matrices within a distance $\epsilon$ of A. We are interested in two aspects of "optimization and pseudospectra." The first concerns maximizing the function "real part" over an $\epsilon$-pseudospectrum of a fixed matrix: this defines a function known as the $\epsilon$-pseudospectral abscissa of a matrix. We present a bisection algorithm to compute this function. Our second interest is in minimizing the $\epsilon$-pseudospectral abscissa over a set of feasible matrices. A prerequisite for local optimization of this function is an understanding of its variational properties, the study of which is the main focus of the paper. We show that, in a neighborhood of any nonderogatory matrix, the $\epsilon$-pseudospectral abscissa is a nonsmooth but locally Lipschitz and subdifferentially regular function for sufficiently small $\epsilon$; in fact, it can be expressed locally as the maximum of a finite number of smooth functions. Along the way we obtain an eigenvalue perturbation result: near a nonderogatory matrix, the eigenvalues satisfy a Hölder continuity property on matrix space---a property that is well known when only a single perturbation parameter is considered. The pseudospectral abscissa is a powerful modeling tool: not only is it a robust measure of stability, but it also reveals the transient (as opposed to asymptotic) behavior of associated dynamical systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".