Eugenics and the Afterlife: Lombroso, Doyle, and the Spiritualist Purification of the Race
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In 'Eugenics: Its Definition, Scope, and Aims ' (1904), inventor, explorer, and statistician Francis Galton anticipates the triumph of eugenic philosophy through its eventual supernaturalization.If the public could only be taught to view eugenic principles, not as the restrictive dictates of a cruel and materialistic science, but as the natural fealty due to a benevolent God, their objections to selective human breeding would disappear.[Eugenics] must be introduced into the national conscience, like a new religion.It has, indeed, strong claims to become an orthodox religious tenet of the future, for eugenics co-operate with the workings of nature by securing that humanity shall be represented by the fittest races … The improvement of our stock seems to me one of the highest objects that we can reasonably attempt.We are ignorant of the ultimate destinies of humanity, but feel perfectly sure that it is as noble a work to raise its level … as it would be disgraceful to abase it.I see no impossibility in eugenics becoming a religious dogma among mankind, but its details must be worked out sedulously in the study. 1
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it