MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2015591101 · doi:10.4153/cjm-2004-030-9

On the Neumann Problem for the Schrödinger Equations with Singular Potentials in Lipschitz Domains

2004· article· en· W2015591101 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Mathematics · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaSimon Fraser UniversityNational Science Foundation
KeywordsLipschitz continuityMathematicsLipschitz domainNeumann boundary conditionDomain (mathematical analysis)Maximal functionMathematical analysisClass (philosophy)Function (biology)Pure mathematicsBoundary value problemSchrödinger equationBoundary (topology)Mathematical physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We consider the Neumann problem for the Schrödinger equations –Δ u + Vu = 0, with singular nonnegative potentials V belonging to the reverse Hölder class ℬ n , in a connected Lipschitz domain Ω R n . Given boundary data g in H p or L p for 1 – ɛ < p ≤ 2, where 0 < ɛ < , it is shown that there is a unique solution, u , that solves the Neumann problem for the given data and such that the nontangential maximal function of ▽ u is in L p (∂Ω). Moreover, the uniform estimates are found.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.519
Threshold uncertainty score0.253

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it