MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2015720255 · doi:10.1002/fld.661

Finite element solution of the Orr–Sommerfeld equation using high precision Hermite elements: plane Poiseuille flow

2004· article· en· W2015720255 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHagen–Poiseuille equationLaminar flowReynolds numberFinite element methodPerturbation (astronomy)MathematicsMechanicsHydrodynamic stabilityPlane (geometry)Numerical analysisMathematical analysisFlow (mathematics)PhysicsGeometryTurbulence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper presents a comprehensive review of the numerical techniques used during the past half century and their accuracy in hydrodynamic stability analysis of plane parallel flows. The paper also describes a finite element solution of the Orr–Sommerfeld equation using high precision Hermite elements. A stability analysis technique is performed by imposing an infinitesimal perturbation to the laminar base flow to determine the thresholds of neutral instabilities or the growth rate of the perturbation for any Reynolds and wave numbers. Validation of the present numerical technique is performed for plane Poiseuille flow. The numerical results, obtained with uniform and nonuniform meshes, show excellent agreement with the most accurate results available in the literature. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.267
Threshold uncertainty score0.545

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it