MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2015871919 · doi:10.1109/mias.2009.934969

Arc-resistant motor control equipment

2009· article· en· W2015871919 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Industry Applications Magazine · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrical Fault Detection and Protection
Canadian institutionsRockwell Automation (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEngineeringArc (geometry)Electrical equipmentAutomotive engineeringCircuit breakerFault (geology)Control (management)Test equipmentTest (biology)Control systemReliability engineeringElectrical engineeringMechanical engineeringComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article outlines the added benefits of arc-resistant medium-voltage (MV) motor-control equipment along with the details surrounding the appropriate installation and site-application considerations when arc- resistant MV control products are being considered. A case history is also included, where arc-resistant MV motor-control equipment was installed at a North American production facility of a large chemical company. Failure within a piece of MV control equipment, whether from a defect, an unusual service condition, lack of maintenance, or maloperation, may initiate an internal arc. Standards and guides have been developed over a period of many years through the cooperative efforts of users, those who specify equipment, manufacturers, and other interested parties to evaluate the ability of a given design to withstand fault conditions. These test conditions were traditionally representative of downstream events, referred to as bolted faults, that simulate a short-circuit condition outside the equipment under test.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.913
Threshold uncertainty score0.666

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it