MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2016003984 · doi:10.1080/14927713.2002.9651304

Civil leisure? Exploring the relationship between leisure, activism and social change

2002· article· en· W2016003984 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueLeisure/Loisir · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicRecreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRealmSociology of leisurePublic spacePoliticsSociologyLeisure studiesSocial activismSpace (punctuation)Political activismSocial changePublic relationsPolitical scienceSocial scienceRecreationLawEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper presents findings from a qualitative study with activists and argues that social activism, particularly public protests, cannot adequately be described by current leisure theory and suggests that a new concept is needed. The notion of civil leisure is then developed and denned as leisure based in resistance concerned with creating public discursive space. This notion is important because it emphasizes the extent to which leisure might be re‐constituted as a public, collective realm where discussions about society can take place. The author concludes by calling on leisure researchers to probe this notion in an effort not just to address the importance of activism as a leisure form, but also to rejuvenate the discussion of leisure, politics, and social change more generally.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.090
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.256
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.079 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it