MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2016188030 · doi:10.1159/000163809

Does a Genetically Determined Aggressive Locomotion Favour the Establishment of Intracellular Macrophage Parasites?

2008· article· en· W2016188030 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePathobiology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMosquito-borne diseases and control
Canadian institutionsMontreal General HospitalMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMacrophagePhenotypeIntracellularBiologyIntracellular parasiteGenetically modified organismExtracellularCell biologyAlleleExtracellular matrixGeneticsGeneIn vitro

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel computerized methodology was used to quantify, for the first time, the 3-dimensional locomotory phenotypes of individual macrophages moving within an extracellular matrix-like hydrated collagen lattice/gel. Comparisons between two macrophage lines genetically susceptible to intracellular parasites (B10S4 and ANA-1) and two genetically resistant (B10R4 and CD2) demonstrated that Bcgs alleles consistently endowed macrophages with an outward searching and active locomotion, whereas Bcgr imparted a retrocessive phenotype. Several different macrophage pathogens may have exploited this genetically determined aggressive locomotory behavior of susceptible macrophages to allow them to rapidly enter a sanctuary.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.614
Threshold uncertainty score0.310

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it