MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2016227736 · doi:10.1021/jz302065w

How Crystals Nucleate and Grow in Aqueous NaCl Solution

2013· article· en· W2016227736 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersWestern Canada Research GridCompute Canada
KeywordsNucleationSupersaturationAqueous solutionCrystal (programming language)Chemical physicsAnhydrousOstwald ripeningCrystal growthSalt (chemistry)CrystallographyMaterials scienceChemistryThermodynamicsPhysical chemistryNanotechnologyPhysicsOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Large-scale molecular dynamics simulations (64 000 particles) are used to examine the microscopic mechanism of crystal nucleation and growth in a slightly supersaturated solution of NaCl in water at 300 K and 1 atm. Early-stage nucleation is observed, and the growth of a single crystal is followed for ∼140 ns. It is shown that the nucleation and growth process is better described by Ostwald's rule of stages than by classical nucleation theory. Crystal nucleation originates in a region where the local salt concentration exceeds that of the bulk solution. The early-stage nucleus is a loosely ordered arrangement of ions that retains a significant amount of water. The residual water is slowly removed as the crystal grows and evolves toward its stable anhydrous state.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.294

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it