Distributed control strategy for flexible link manipulators
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SUMMARY This paper presents a nonlinear distributed control strategy for flexible-link manipulators to solve the tracking control problem in the joint space and cancel vibrations of the links. First, the dynamic of an n -flexible-link manipulator is decomposed into n subsystems. Each subsystem has a pair of one joint and one link. The distributed control strategy is applied to each subsystem starting from the last subsystem. The strategy of control consists in controlling the n th joint and stabilizing the n th link by assuming that the remaining subsystems are stable. Then, going backward to the ( n − 1)th subsystem, the same control strategy is applied to each corresponding joint-link subsystem until the first. Sliding mode technique is used to develop the control law of each subsystem and the global stability of the resulting tracking errors is proved using the Lyapunov technique. This algorithm was tested on a two-flexible-link manipulator and gave effective results, a good tracking performance, and capability to eliminate the links' vibrations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it