Oxidants, nitric oxide and prostanoids in the developing ocular vasculature: a basis for ischemic retinopathy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The choroid is the main source of oxygen to the retina. In contrast to the adult, the absence of autoregulation of choroidal blood flow in the newborn leads to hyperoxygenation of the retina. In the immature retina which contains relatively low levels of antioxidants this hyperoxygenation favors peroxidation including the generation of biologically active isoprostanes, and results in vasoconstriction and vascular cytotoxicity leading to ischemia, which predisposes to the development of a vasoproliferative retinopathy, commonly termed retinopathy of prematurity. During frequently encountered oxidative stress to the perinate, the combined absence of vascular autoregulation and excessive oxygen delivery to the eyes of the developing subject is largely the result of a complex epigenetic and genetic interplay between prostanoids and nitric oxide (NO) systems on vasomotor regulation. The effects of certain prostaglandins are NO-dependent; conversely, those of NO have also been found to be largely prostaglandin I(2)-mediated in the eye; and NO synthase expression seems to be significantly regulated by other prostaglandins apparently through activation of functional perinuclear prostanoid receptors which affect gene transcription. The increased production of both prostaglandins and NO in the perinate augment ocular blood flow and as a result oxygen delivery to an immature retina partly devoid of antioxidant defenses. The ensuing peroxidation results in impaired circulation (partly thromboxane A(2)-dependent) and vascular integrity, leading to ischemia which predisposes to abnormal preretinal neovascularization, a major feature of ischemic retinopathy. Because tissue oxygenation is largely dependent upon circulation and critical in the generation of reactive oxygen species, and since the latter exert a major contribution in the pathogenesis of retinopathy of prematurity, it is important to understand the mechanisms that govern ocular blood flow. In this review we focus on the important and complex interaction between prostanoid, NO and peroxidation products on circulatory control of the immature retina.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".