MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

David I: The King who Made Scotland By Richard Oram

2006· article· en· W2016978786 on OpenAlexaff
Cynthia J. Neville

Bibliographic record

VenueHistory · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicScottish History and National Identity
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiographyOriginalityHistorySubject (documents)NarrativeClassicsInterpretation (philosophy)PublishingBrotherReputationStyle (visual arts)RulerArt historyLiteratureLawArtPhilosophyLibrary sciencePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

David I: The King who Made Scotland . By Richard Oram . Tempus . 2004 . 255 pp. £17.99 . The ‘Scottish Monarchs’ series of Tempus Publishing is intended to offer the general public a collection of royal biographies that are at once ‘scholarly and accessible’. Oram's volume is the first. If, by the term ‘accessible’, the series editor has in mind a lively narrative style and a vivid engagement with the subject matter, then Oram's choice as a founding author is highly appropriate. Historians familiar with his publications will recognize here the energy that characterizes all his work and the vigour with which he pursues his arguments. The ‘scholarly’ aspects of this book (which, surprisingly, represents the first attempt ever to write a biography of this much-respected ruler) are rather less apparent. Oram's David I is a composite figure, made up in large part of the author's own interpretation of published chronicle sources and a selection of secondary works. There are some glimpses of originality in his account of the king's life, notably the suggestion that the ‘lost years’ between 1108 and 1113 may have seen David on campaign in Normandy in support of his brother-in-law, King Henry I of England. The concluding chapter, moreover, offers a well-balanced and in many respects highly illuminating assessment of David's reputation over the course of almost a thousand years of historical writing. His protestations that his biographical study is not intended to be a ‘definitive study’ of early twelfth-century Scotland notwithstanding, Oram in fact attempts to do much more in this work than retell the events of the king's life. While he touches on some important developments within and beyond the realm, however, he ignores a much larger number of equally momentous changes. In these portions of the book, moreover, he draws on the scholarship of a few, clearly favoured, colleagues, omitting entirely the equally meritorious work of many more. The result is a one-dimensional view of the king who, as the subtitle alleges, ‘made’ medieval Scotland. Readers of Oram's book will come away knowing a great deal about David I, his family, his achievements and his reverses, but they will have very little understanding of the ways in which he so thoroughly changed the lives and mores of the people he ruled.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.078
Threshold uncertainty score0.260

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0780.040

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHistorySame topicScottish History and National IdentityFrench-language works237,207