Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Over the last decade, gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) have evolved from histogenetically obscure gastrointestinal mesenchymal tumors to well-defined tumors with distinctive clinical, morphologic, ultrastructural, histogenetic, and molecular characteristics, for which targeted therapy is available. This is largely attributable to the discovery of CD117 overexpression and activating mutations in c-kit or platelet-derived growth factor alpha genes in most of GISTs. The availability of specific diagnostic tests and targeted therapy for GISTs has led to an increased awareness of these tumors. At the same time, the list of potential GIST mimics has lengthened considerably and it has become increasingly important that GISTs be distinguished from their mimics because correct diagnosis has implications for both treatment and prognosis. The purpose of this review is to provide an update of the expanding differential diagnosis of GISTS, to draw attention to unusual GIST variants, to provide a practical approach the differential diagnosis of GISTs and to highlight some of the challenges faced by pathologists in resolving this differential diagnosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it