Sister-city Partnerships and Cultural Recreation: the Case of Scarborough, Canada and Sagamihara, Japan
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Sister-city partnerships have existed for over 200 years. The goal of sister-city partnerships is to bring people together to foster mutual understanding, and to develop mutual benefits through the sharing of knowledge and new opportunities. A review of literature depicts that a number of factors entice the existence of sister-city partnerships such as educational services, political action and cultural recreation. However, scant attention has been placed on the role cultural recreation plays in the existence of sister-city partnerships. The purpose of this study is to examine the role cultural recreation plays in the existence of the sister-city partnership between the former city of Scarborough, Canada and Sagamihara, Japan. It is argued that cultural recreation is an important part of this sister-city partnership as it is prevalent in the educational services and political action pursuits that govern the existence of the alliance of these two cities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it