MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2017162822 · doi:10.4043/24448-ms

Submarine High Voltage Power Transmission: Challenges and Opportunities

2013· article· en· W2017162822 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOTC Brasil · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOffshore Engineering and Technologies
Canadian institutionsIntecsea (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubseaGas compressorElectrical engineeringPower transmissionEngineeringElectric powerPower (physics)SubmarineHigh voltageElectric power transmissionElectric power systemTransmission (telecommunications)VoltageMarine engineeringAutomotive engineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Seabed equipment is at times deployed to do work on, or add energy to, produced fluids to improve or ensure sustained flow when natural reservoir pressure declines. This hardware includes subsea pumps and compressors. The power required to create a meaningful impact on production with these systems is generally substantial, i.e. several thousand horsepower or more. The power supplied to a fluid is hydraulic and is accommodated through application of rotating machinery (subsea pumps/compressors). This machinery converts electric power into rotational power through an electric motor, which then turns the shaft of the pump/compressor to do the work. Electric power to the subsea equipment from the source is generally transmitted via subsea power cables operating at 50/60 Hz. However, as distance and power levels become ever greater, stable AC power transmission becomes challenging due to excessive reactive power demand within the transmission cables. What follows is a discussion of the present and anticipated, future power demands associated with subsea pumping and compression systems and the technical issues associated with conventional long distance, high power AC transmission for these applications. Distribution system topology and technology limits will be discussed to address more complex subsea configurations. Furthermore, the focus of submarine cable applications will be limited to Subsea Tiebacks to streamline the subject matter and manage document length. Finally, solutions (opportunities) are proposed to address the range of issues presented. Solutions include high voltage, low frequency power transmission and high voltage DC power transmission. Reference is also made to this year's Subsea Processing Poster, developed by INTECSEA and published by Offshore Magazine (March 2013). In particular, Graph 4 - Subsea Power Transmission is briefly described to reinforce the aforementioned subject matter and afford readers a fuller understanding of the range and depth of information embedded within the graphic. Introduction: A Brief History of Submarine Cable Applications Early Uses Submarine power cables have been around for more than a century and their application has evolved over the years. Early in life, submarine power cables were used to supply isolated offshore facilities such as lighthouses, infirmary ships, etc. As submarine power cable technology evolved, cables were used to link shore-based power grids across bays, estuaries, rivers, straits [1]. Present Day Uses Today, submarine cables are used in a variety of applications, including:Carrying power between countries or to remote locationsCarrying power and communications to offshore installations, e.g. oil/gas platforms and ocean science observatories;Transferring power from offshore renewable energy schemes to shore, e.g. wind, wave and tidal systems. With growing reliance on offshore-based renewable energy schemes, many countries now class submarine power cables as critical infrastructure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.969
Threshold uncertainty score0.559

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.165 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it